I started to play with my initial component, rotating its three axes and changing the scale in z axis while paths are created. The result is just product of the interaction among the components. Any shape was pre-stablished - one of the rules for this work. The emergent behavior is the starting point for develping spatial contitions.
keywords for this ex.: redundancy, differentiation, informal diagrams, multiple, unexpected pahts, formless.
I haven't changed the the morphology of the component in this exercise. I'm trying to do so with other explorations, but any successful example til this moment.
2 Kommentare:
Dear Claudia,
thanks for posting your most recent explorations. Now its time to wrap up the explorations and to decide which way you want to go. So you can find a clear line in the presentation of your project so far for the midterms.
I send allready the layout for the midterm which serves also as a Guide for what you have to present at the midterms.
For you, I think, it is time to find out how the enclosures can differentiate different sapces. Simply put: make a plan and section, so we can see how your building roughly works.
I still think that this:
http://ornamente.blogspot.com/2008/11/explorations-with-polyhedra_23.html
is your most successfull approach so far. In terms of component behaviour and component esthetics.
It´s up to you which way you want to go, nonetheless I highly recommend to stick to decision in order to make faster progress.
All the best,
Matias del Campo
PS: I sent to Alexandra a couple of links to images of plans, so you have an Idea of what the studio culture should absorb in terms of plan graphics...
M
Kommentar veröffentlichen