Another simple hybrid form is populated with ornament to understand the spatial conditions created by them. Although the form came from the long evolutionary process but still the idea behind that was to create the non-linear forms of nature. The low height entry of the building leads to the main exhibition space with a loft that connects to the other space through bridge. Random arrangement of ornaments are used here but keeping in mind structural intergrity of whole mass.
Shadows are the integral part of these ornaments that not only gives the sense of another dimension to them but also to the space either enclosed by them or outside.
1 Kommentar:
Hanee,
thanks for posting your inbetween results. After scrutinizing your recent posts I came up with this analysis: The most successful approaches so far are those that do not try to elevate themselves from the ground, but actually those that embrace and allmost slump on the ground:
http://ornamente.blogspot.com/2008/12/hanee-first-intermediate-form-tested.html
The distribution of component that are ground and elevation simultainously seems to be the most promising ones, also in terms of achieving a novel architectural condition.
Allow me to recommend to you to use this approach and stick to it. They are way more exiting then the cantilevering elements of your most recent approaches, and can result in a very exiting and highly innovative solution.
There is only one or two things you have to solve:
The matter of scale: http://ornamente.blogspot.com/2008/12/hanee-first-intermediate-form-tested.html
is about the size of a pavillon with, lets say 500m2
our project has about 2000m2
Here are two images to visualize the size difference:
This is the interior of the Neue National Galerie, Mies van der Rohe, Berlin, 1965-68
This interior has around the size of 2000m2, about the size of our project. (Check out the size of the people!)
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/fa267/mies/mies_ng13.jpg
This is the Villa Savoye by Le Corbusier.
This house has about 400m2.
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/Corbu.html
I think this problem is not so difficult to solve.
The other issue is the Figure ground problem. It would be great if we could see till the midterms how your building actually is touching the ground...what sort of communication goes on there.
About plans and so on.
No furniture or the likes please, check out this plans to understand roughly what we are up to:
http://www.arcspace.com/architects/hadid/nordpark/28nordpark.jpg
http://www.ovion.de/blog/wp-content/sec_01.jpg
http://www.ovion.de/blog/wp-content/floorplan_01.jpg
http://www.e-architect.co.uk/barcelona/jpgs/gas_natural_tower_plan
I hope this helped.
What I would love to see is you sticking to one decision and working on the one decision rigorously....
best,
Matias
Kommentar veröffentlichen