QUESTION: which components are most successful members in these families and why?
Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2008
winnie [morphological component part 2]
After discussion with Sandra, I decided to (should I?) abort the honeycomb approach for creating a component and go back to develop the component from more experiments... I have highlighted the component which could be interesting to me... I will make aggregation of some components tomorrow to look for interesting / surprising effects...
QUESTION: which components are most successful members in these families and why?
QUESTION: which components are most successful members in these families and why?
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
2 Kommentare:
Sorry Winnie, but at the midterms YOU have to tell us which what the most successful component. As a proof of concept, you will present the components and their test-arrangements (to create a surface), that will eliminate a couple of components
then you will show us your strategy to arrange the components spatially - to create a body /and its apertures
that will eliminate other components
the one you think is the most successful will survive this process
... and no honeycomb meshes
meshes are surfaces and not components!!!
Kommentar veröffentlichen